Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Scottish independence: Academics fear a university brain drain of country's best scientists

Institutions could lose billions of pounds of funding for research

Ian Johnston
Monday 01 September 2014 04:15 EDT
Comments
Several senior scientists have already been contacted by English universities and have said they will look to leave in the event of a 'Yes' vote
Several senior scientists have already been contacted by English universities and have said they will look to leave in the event of a 'Yes' vote

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Scottish universities could face a brain drain of some of their finest scientists if the country votes for independence, a number of leading academics fear.

They voiced concerns that the institutions could lose billions of pounds of funding for research.

Several senior scientists have already been contacted by English universities because of the prospect of a yes vote in the referendum on 18 September, sources told The Guardian.

Professor Richard Cogdell, director of Glasgow University’s Institute of Molecular, Cell and Systems Biology, said: “I have had contact with staff who have said 'if it's a yes vote, then I would be looking to leave.'"

Professor David Weller, director of Edinburgh University’s Centre for Population Health Sciences, said four-fifths of the centre’s work was carried out with cancer charities and other researchers in the rest of Britain.

“There's just no way if Scotland was a separate country that kind of arrangement could be sustained. There are huge concerns in the area I work in,” he said.

And Professor Jim Naismith, head of the biomedical sciences research complex at St Andrews University, said: “There will a drift away [of expertise]. It will start slowly but there will be a clear drift.

“It's not just the people who leave, we won't be able to bring people in from outside.”

A source close to Mike Russell, the Scottish education secretary, told The Guardian that the academics’ concerns were unfounded.

“We have already made clear that in all circumstances we will guarantee that research funding is maintained during and after Scotland's transition to independence,” he said.

And Dr Steven Watson, a Glasgow University mathematician who helped found the Academics for Yes group, said research spending was being used as a “political football” and pointed to international collaboration within the European Union.

“The UK certainly doesn't have any barrier to dealing with the EU, why wouldn't the UK choose to do that with a nation [Scotland] which is far closer and has far more affinity with,” he said.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in