Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Prisoners' appeal to vote in Scottish independence referendum rejected

The prisoners said the ban breached their human rights

Kashmira Gander
Thursday 24 July 2014 19:55 EDT
Comments
Two prisoners have lost a court appeal to vote in the Scottish referendum
Two prisoners have lost a court appeal to vote in the Scottish referendum (Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Two prisoners, who argued that rules which bar them from voting in the Scottish independence referendum breach their human rights, have lost an appeal at the Supreme Court.

The UK’s highest court dismissed claims brought by Leslie Moohan and Andrew Gillon following a day-long hearing in London on Thursday.

A panel of Supreme Court Justices analysed provisions laid out in the Scottish Independence Referendum (Franchise) Act 2013, and considered whether a ban on prisoners voting was incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights, and whether they breached the common law right to vote.

The justices were told that both inmates want to vote in the referendum on September 18 but are not eligible under the Franchise Act.

Lawyers for the two men argued that the prohibition is incompatible with prisoners' rights under common and European law.

But the justices disagreed. Supreme Court president Lord Neuberger said reasons for the decision would be given at a later date.

The prisoners had appealed to the Supreme Court after their claims had been dismissed in Scotland by the Outer House and Inner House of the Court of Session.

The prisoners, who were each convicted of murdering a man, are being held in Scotland, and did not attend the hearing.

Moohan is not eligible for release until 2023 while Gillon is not eligible for release until later this year.

Scottish Conservative justice spokeswoman Margaret Mitchell said: “I welcome the decision taken by the UK Supreme Court.

"This appeal, had it been successful, would have had disastrous consequences, not least for the proposed EU referendum in 2017.

"We remain resolute in our opposition to granting the vote to prisoners.

"Voting is a basic human right and it is completely correct you forfeit this right when you commit a crime and are sent to prison."

Additional reporting by PA

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in