Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Scots clerics attack head of kirk

Thursday 06 January 1994 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

SCOTLAND'S most prominent churchman, under attack for his views on the Virgin Birth, yesterday defended his stand and denied the issue was splitting his church.

In a letter to the Scotsman and Herald newspapers yesterday, more than 100 Church of Scotland ministers criticised the Moderator of the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland, the Rt Rev Dr James Weatherhead, who may now face a vote of censure.

The ministers said that the Virgin Birth was historical fact and an 'integral' part of faith. They accused Dr Weatherhead of using the media 'to voice his personal scepticism rather than to promote the Church's unity and faith'.

In a sermon in Edinburgh last Sunday, Dr Weatherhead defended the Bishop of Durham, Dr David Jenkins, by declaring the Virgin Birth need not necessarily be viewed as a literal truth. Yesterday, he said: 'I am not surprised they should think as they do, but I am a little surprised they should rush to make comment when I don't think many of them have read the full text of what I said.'

He added: 'I think it is wrong to talk of a split. This group has been meeting regularly, it is not a new group in the Church, we are aware of it and we are aware they hold certain views which are acceptable within the Church of Scotland.'

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in