Science teachers under fire
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.TEACHERS are failing to deliver the national curriculum in science because their own knowledge of the subject is so shaky, a new report claims, writes Julia Hagedorn.
In primary schools teachers are jumping parts of the curriculum that they find difficult, leaving secondary level teachers to cope with gaps in pupils' knowledge.
The authors of a two-year project to evaluate science in schools, carried out at the University of Liverpool, add that teachers' own concerns about their lack of knowledge mean that they find difficulty in helping children understand new concepts.
The report, published yesterday by the School Curriculum and Assessment Authority, called for a review of the entire science order and research to identify a better match when teaching both the exceptionally able and those with learning difficulties.
The report was one of four consultation documents on English, mathematics, science and technology published yesterday by SCAA which will contribute to a review of the national curriculum.
The proposals for English say that children should no longer be penalised for using their own dialects, and should not have to demonstrate standard English until they reach level five of the national curriculum (bright 11-year-olds).
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments