Navy involved in ‘Operation Dog’s Dinner’ to tackle migrant crossing, MPs hear
Ministers came under fire from some on their backbenches.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Tory MPs have warned the Royal Navy will be operating a “taxi service” for migrants crossing the Channel under “Operation Dog’s Dinner”.
Ministers came under fire from some on their backbenches for not seeking to push back small boats trying to reach England from France.
The Ministry of Defence (MoD) is expected to take over command of the operation from Border Force by the end of the month in a move signed off by Prime Minister Boris Johnson.
Defence minister James Heappey said military involvement is part of a wider plan from the Government which will be announced in the coming weeks.
The current details are believed to have been announced as part of a Government bid to offer “red meat” to Tory MPs in a bid to drive attention away from Downing Street party allegations.
But Conservative former minister Sir Edward Leigh warned: “In the absence of ministers having the political will to use pushback, what is the point in appointing a Royal Naval admiral to help Border Force to be a more efficient taxi service so that the migrants will know that now ‘we have got the Royal Navy going to pick us up and we will be taken safety to the UK, and we will be put in a hotel and we will never ever be sent home’?
“This is just an embarrassment.
“Will the minister now co-ordinate with his colleagues to do what we have been suggesting for months now and that we get rid of the pull factors, namely we reform any piece of legislation that is necessary, including the Human Rights Act, and people who do this illegal crossing are arrested, put in a prison, and then deported?”
Mr Heappey replied: “His exhortations and those of colleagues have been heard.”
Conservative MP Philip Hollobone (Kettering) added in the Commons: “This isn’t Operation Red Meat, it’s Operation Dog’s Dinner.
“If the mission statement was to reduce the level of illegal people trafficking across the Channel, I’d support it.
“But the mission statement as far as I understand it is to lower the number of people landing on their own terms on UK beaches.
“So what the minister has effectively announced with the deployment of Royal Navy vessels is asylum seekers only need to get halfway across the Channel before being intercepted by the Royal Navy.
“This is going to incentivise people traffickers, they’ll see the Royal Navy ship on the horizon and they’ll say ‘point your dinghy in that direction, you only need to get halfway’ and the Royal Navy will pick them up.
“The only way this will work if the Royal Navy intercepts asylum seekers and returns them back to France.
“Without the second bit, this simply won’t work.”
Mr Heappey replied: “The last bit would be impossible without French permission and French permission has not been given.
“But I don’t accept his characterisation of what is being spoken about today.
“The MoD’s mission is to make sure nobody arrives in the UK on their own terms.
“It means nobody arrives in the UK without having been intercepted at sea or as they land.
“What happens next he’ll just have to wait a short while and I’m sure all will become clear.”
Tobias Ellwood, Conservative chairman of the Defence Committee, warned: “There is a real danger of mission creep here, with further naval assets being sucked into this challenge.”
Conservative former minister Mark Francois welcomed bringing in the military, but said: “If they are not going to be involved in pushback and they are not going to deploy sonic weapons, what are they actually going to do?”
For Labour, shadow defence secretary John Healey said the military are “there to protect the nation, not to protect Tory ministers”, and claimed the announcement “is the official confirmation the Home Secretary is failing”.
Labour MP Luke Pollard (Plymouth Sutton and Devonport) said: “The sonic weapons, the long-range acoustic weapons, are already fitted to Border Force vessels, so as the Royal Navy has now assumed operational control of Border Force, can he make the statement that no Border Force sonic weapons will be used for migrant crossings?”
Mr Heappey replied: “If Border Force vessels are fitted with a capability that the Royal Navy commander feels inappropriate for use, then he won’t direct that it is used, but that is his judgment.”