Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.LORD MACKAY of Clashfern, the Lord Chancellor, is implicitly rebuked by the Royal Commission over his recent moves to cut the spiralling cost of legal aid, writes Adam Sage.
Measures to replace hourly rates for criminal work in magistrates' courts with a system of standard fees are highlighted as a matter of concern. The report echoes the arguments of the Law Society that lawyers could be under pressure to cut corners. There was a risk that standard fees 'may be a disincentive to solicitors to do the amount of work on a case that it requires', it says.
It also questions recent moves to limit eligibility for legal aid, saying: 'We would . . . be very seriously concerned if the Government's proposals were to have the effect of increasing the number of defendants who have no legal representation in court.'
The cutbacks were announced by Lord Mackay last November in an attempt to curb a legal-aid budget that was set to double to more than pounds 2bn by the mid-Nineties.
Solicitors are likely to point out that if the commission's call for a reduction in the number of Crown Court hearings is supported by the Government, this would serve to save substantial sums of the money.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments