Royal Commission on Criminal Justice: Inconsistencies not investigated
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.LAWYERS and politicians who have studied the case of Paul Cleeland, one of Britain's longest- serving prisoners, have few doubts that had there been an independent body to investigate the possibility of a miscarriage of justice, he would not still be in jail, writes Heather Mills.
He was jailed 21 years ago for the shotgun murder of Terry Clarke, a friend and business partner. There were anomalies and inconsistencies in the case: the killing was witnessed by Mrs Clarke who gave a description which bore no resemblance to Cleeland; three experts have said that the ancient weapon supposed to have been used could not have caused the injuries; his prison records were altered in a way which affected his 1977 appeal; the 'expert' who gave forensic evidence against Cleeland had no formal qualifications; and a police inquiry into the case remains secret.
Because the Home Office division which examines miscarriages of justice, C3, can only look at 'new' evidence, no one has considered its inconsistencies. Cleeland, now 50, who has always protested his innocence, has resorted to ingenious magistrates' court and judicial review hearings to highlight his case.
(Photograph omitted)
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments