Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Rock bolts cleared of causing pit disaster: Inquiry backs roof support system used when three died

Thursday 10 February 1994 20:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A CONTROVERSIAL rock-bolting system did not cause a tunnel roof collapse that killed three miners, a report said yesterday.

But the inquiry into the disaster at Bilsthorpe Colliery, Nottinghamshire, last August recommended that the practice of 'skin-to-skin' working - where two tunnels are driven alongside each another - should end.

David Eves, deputy director general of the Health and Safety Executive, said yesterday: 'The accident has taught us that we just don't know enough about the potential for movement in the upper strata when roadways are being driven in the 'skin-to-skin' mode.

'That was not apparent to anyone concerned before the accident.'

The final report by HSE investigators suggests that rock bolts, driven into strata to support the roof instead of conventional supports, may even have helped some of the men escape.

It found that the fall was caused by movement of rock in nearby abandoned workings, probably triggered by high rate of advance in the tunnel.

The Health and Safety Commission has appointed Sir Bernard Crossland of Queen's University, Belfast, to carry out independent public investigation into any new or further evidence that may exist.

The men who died were David Shelton, 31, a colliery under-manager, Bill McCulloch, 26, and Peter Alcock, 50.

Bilsthorpe was one of 12 mines on a market-testing list when the cave-in occurred. There were allegations after the tragedy that managers were pushing ahead too quickly on work to open up new coal faces and keep the pit viable.

The report said the roof fall was in a roadway being driven through coal in the 'skin-to-skin' method.

It found that the fall was caused by a movement of rock in strata high above the roadway due to a reconsolidation or movement of the waste (or fallen rocks) in the abandoned area, which would normally have held the higher strata in place.

The report recommended that 'skin-to-skin' working next to worked out areas should end.

It also recommended further research on factors affecting the siting of new roadways and an extension of reporting procedures in connection with falls of ground. British Coal welcomed the findings and said: 'We are completely in accord with the inquiry's conclusions and we are already implementing the recommendations made by the investigators.

'For many years, British Coal has driven similar roadways at collieries, particularly in the Midlands, without major incident. All such developments have now been stopped.'

The company believed the strata failure at Bilsthorpe was caused by a 'rare combination of factors'.

The report suggested the tragedy was not reasonably foreseeable.

The pit's strata monitoring system had been installed to recommended standards and performed as designed. But neither it nor any other system known to be in common use was capable of detecting or giving warning of such rapid strata movement as occurred at the time of the fall, the report said.

It added: 'It is considered that the rate and magnitude of the fall was such that any free-standing support conventionally used would have been unable to withstand the load.'

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in