Government urged to ‘seriously consider’ leaving contract with tutoring provider
Advantaged pupils will see more benefit from the 2022 exam changes, Robert Halfon said.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Government should “seriously consider” breaking its contract with the provider of one of its flagship education catch-up programmes, a senior MP has said.
Robert Halfon chair of the Commons education select committee, said that nearly £5 billion had been spent on education catch-up by the Government, but that he feared “this funding is not reaching the most vulnerable children in our communities”.
Writing for the website Conservative Home, he said that upwards of 96% of schools in the South had engaged with the Government’s flagship National Tutoring Programme (NTP) which aims to support pupils to recover lost learning from the pandemic.
Just 50% of schools in the North had engaged with it, he said.
The Government must look again at the contract with Randstad and seriously consider enacting the break clause. If Randstad cannot up its game, it is time to say goodbye
He said the NTP, contracted to Dutch company Randstad, “has the potential to be one of the greatest interventions made to date” to support pupils’ recovery from the impact of the pandemic.
“And yet, despite significant investment, it is falling far short of its targets and it’s not going far enough or happening quickly enough,” he added.
“The Government must look again at the contract with Randstad and seriously consider enacting the break clause. If Randstad cannot up its game, it is time to say goodbye.”
In January, the education committee heard from headteachers that catch-up tutors provided by Randstad were “inconsistent” in quality and not always “very good with children”.
There are huge problems with the technology hub that is meant to organise all of the tutoring
In December 2021, Nick Bent, chief executive of the Tutor Trust, one of the partners delivering tutoring in schools under Randstad, told MPs that Randstad did not “have enough staff or the right expertise” and there were “problems” with the tuition hub.
“There are huge problems with the technology hub that is meant to organise all of the tutoring and some of us are still refusing to use that tuition hub because it’s so dysfunctional,” he added.
Mr Halfon drew attention to the fact that just 8% of the tutoring sessions for this year have begun out of a target of 524,000.
He also warned that the advance notice released for exams, released on Monday, could benefit the most advantaged students.
Pupils have been given advance notice of the topics covered in some of their GCSE and A-level exams to mitigate the disruption to their education caused by the pandemic.
Mr Halfon said: “We know that over 13,000 children in exam years have not returned to school for the most part.
“So a system has been created where advantaged pupils will feel the benefit of the advanced notice, but their worse-off peers will struggle. Furthermore, we risk ignoring the 13,000 pupils in A-Level and GCSE year groups who have not returned to school at all.”