PM says investments in weapons companies meet ethical criteria
Rishi Sunak said the Government will seek to incentivise private sector investment by stating that defence investment counts towards ESG assessments.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Private sector investment in weapons companies counts towards āethicalā environmental, social and governance (ESG) criteria, Rishi Sunak has said.
The Prime Minister said the world is āthe most dangerous it has beenā since the end of the Cold War as he promised an extra Ā£75 billion in defence spending by 2030.
During a speech at a military base in Warsaw, Poland, he promised a further Ā£10 billion over the next 10 years to ensure the military does not run out of ammunition and missiles as the UK draws lessons from the war in Ukraine.
But Mr Sunak said the Government will also seek to incentivise companies to invest in weapons by stating that it counts towards ESG criteria ā which involves considerations around how a firm manages its impact on people and the planet.
The Prime Minister said: āTo encourage private sector investment into defence production, I can also announce today that weāre going to put beyond doubt that defence investment does count towards environment, social and governance assessments.
āThere is nothing more ethical than defending our way of life from those who threaten it.
āNow all of this will put us at the forefront of the global defence industry, allow us to hugely ramp up defence production and give our armed forces the capability they need to keep us safe.ā
The comments coincided with a joint statement from the Treasury and the Investment Association, the trade body that represents UK investment managers, declaring that defence investment is ācompatible with ESG considerationsā.
āInvesting in defence companies contributes to our national security, defends the civil liberties we all enjoy, while delivering long-term returns for pensions funds and retail investors,ā the online statement said.
āThat is why the UKās world leading investment management industry supports our defence sector, with the Investment Associationās members having invested Ā£35 billion in UK defence companies.
āInvesting in good, high-quality, well-run defence companies is compatible with ESG considerations as long-term sustainable investment is about helping all sectors and all companies in the economy succeed.ā
In recent months, ministers have repeatedly expressed concern over defence firms being excluded from access to capital due to ESG criteria.
Defence Secretary Grant Shapps has spoken out against an investment culture guided by ESG policies that exclude the sector.
In a post on X, formerly Twitter, last year, Mr Shapps said: āIt is very wrong for woke fund managers to imagine theyāre being principled by de-funding our defence sector due to so-called ethical investment rules.
āIn fact, we have a moral imperative to invest in defence because failing to do so would surrender our nationās protection.ā
In September, defence minister Baroness Goldie also said defence firmsā exclusion from access to debt and equity capital āthreatens an important part of the economyā and āthreatens to increase the cost of procurement, diverting taxpayersā money away from other defence spending and from public servicesā.