Rights to wine lake tested in court case
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.WINE CUSTOMERS who left thousands of cases in the cellars of a merchant who went out of business asked the High Court yesterday to rule in a test case to decide whether they are entitled to their property, writes Stephen Ward.
The receivers, Nigel Vooght and Christopher Hughes, argue that although the cases had been paid for, unless they were individually labelled as belonging to a particular customer, they should go to the National Westminster Bank, which has first call on any assets of the failed company, Ellis Son and Viddler, of Lewes in East Sussex.
The court was told by Peter Arden, for the receivers, that buyers commonly pay a merchant to store their wine until they want to drink it, to preserve it in perfect condition. Some wine would have been bought through the merchant and some elsewhere.
Roger ter Haar QC, for the customers, said a stock book identified how much of each wine each customer owned.
The case continues today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments