Retrial for couple in mower 'murder plot': Appeal court quashes convictions of barrister's wife and her lover
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A RETRIAL was ordered yesterday in the case of the woman and her lover who were convicted of plotting to murder her wealthy barrister husband by faking an accident with his lawnmower and a duck pond.
The Court of Appeal quashed the convictions of Susan Whybrow, 52, and Dennis Saunders, 57, a flying instructor, who were freed on bail pending retrial at the Old Bailey.
In 1991, Whybrow was jailed for eight years and Saunders given 10 years at Norwich Crown Court for allegedly conspiring to kill Christopher Whybrow, from whom she is now divorced, to gain control of his estate at Leavenheath, Suffolk, and an inheritance of pounds 400,000.
Ordering a retrial on London as soon as possible, Lord Taylor, the Lord Chief Justice, sitting with Mr Justice French and Mr Justice Pill, said that they would give their reasons in full at a later date.
At the appeal hearing, lawyers for the couple argued that the convictions were unsafe because the judge at their original trial, Mr Justice Ian Kennedy, robbed them of a fair hearing by taking on the role of the prosecution and intervening during their evidence with hostility, sarcasm and 'naked mockery'. Their lawyers urged the court to quash the convictions. They said that a retrial could not be held because of the length of time since the alleged events and the wide publicity surrounding the case.
During the six-day trial, it was alleged by the Crown that the lovers, who met when Whybrow took flying lessons, had planned to kill Mr Whybrow but make his death appear as an accident by tipping him and his ride-on lawnmower into a duck pond, giving the impression that he had driven into the pool by mistake. The alleged plot, described as 'one of the most bizarre and hare-brained schemes imaginable', failed when Mr Whybrow escaped and swam across the pond to safety.
The couple denied conspiracy to murder but admitted kidnapping and conspiring to cause actual bodily harm, claiming that they were trying to teach Mr Whybrow a lesson because of his alleged cruelty to his wife.
Yesterday's bail order carries conditions of residence for both - Whybrow at her mother's home in Plymouth, and Saunders at his address in Colchester, Essex. They were ordered to surrender their passports and Saunders must surrender his flying licence.
(Photographs omitted)
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments