Rattle issues ultimatum on orchestra's funding
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.SIMON RATTLE, the brightest star in classical music in Britain, yesterday threatened not to renew his contract as principal conductor with the City of Birmingham Symphony Orchestra if the latter's funding is not increased, writes David Lister.
The 39-year-old conductor has given the city's orchestra a world-class reputation. Undoubtedly, it would find it hard to maintain that if Rattle left. The conductor, who has led the CBSO since 1980, would be in demand from orchestras not just in London but in Europe and America if he does not renew his contract, which expires in 1996, and which should have been renewed last month.
Rattle's ultimatum is an embarrassment for the Arts Council, which has decided not to increase the CBSO's pounds 1.15m grant next year.
Despite audiences averaging 90 per cent capacity, the CBSO will have a deficit of pounds 250,000 by April. Birmingham council gives it pounds 1m a year but will not give it more unless the Arts Council matches the increase.
Last night, Rattle said: 'I am not prepared to lead this wonderful orchestra into decline. The problem in this country is that arts organisations that do really well are penalised. Birmingham has been tremendously supportive. But I think that the Arts Council believe that the arts will be all right in Birmingham whatever happens.
'That's wrong. The Arts Council have to put their money where their mouth is.'
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments