'Random selection' by schools is fair
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE selection policies of two heavily over-subscribed Lancashire schools, Habergham High School, Burnley, and Ormskirk Grammar School, have been ruled lawful and fair by a High Court judge.
Mr Justice MacPherson rejected a challenge by the parents of five children from Burnley and Ormskirk who were denied admission to their chosen schools. They claimed that the selection policies were entirely random, not unlike a penalty shoot-out in a football match, their counsel, James Goudie QC, told the hearing.
Yesterday's ruling opens the way for Lancashire County Council to enshrine the 'random selection' system in its admissions policy, which is under review.
Places at both schools, which are near the top of the academic 'league table', have been allotted by the same process for more than a decade. Preference is given to children with an older sibling at the schools and those with a specific medical reason for attending a particular school.
The third criterion is home 'proximity' to the schools - the so-called geographic test - the cause of the parental objection.
The judge refused leave to appeal against his decision.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments