Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Railtrack sees little scope for more services: No sign of return to work by striking signal staff as 45 per cent of trains run. Barrie Clement reports

Barrie Clement
Tuesday 30 August 1994 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

RAILTRACK last night admitted that there was little scope to improve services during strikes unless more signal workers return to work.

Yesterday the company opened 45 per cent of the network compared with 40 per cent last week, but British Rail, which is responsible for services, said there was only a slight improvement in the number of trains operating, which was still about 45 per cent. Management reported that there was no sign of a return to work as the RMT transport union began a 48- hour strike at noon yesterday.

A spokeswoman for BR said full details would not be available until today, but there appeared to be no appreciable change from last week when out of 600 signal box staff working during the industrial action, 342 were RMT members.

She said it was fair to say that Railtrack was nearing the limit of how much of the network it could bring into operation without a substantial return to work.

Some regions ran trains for the first time on a strike day, including the main West Coast line between London and Scotland, but the through service between London and Brighton was cancelled. It is acknowledged by senior industry sources that a plan to encourage BR staff with signalling experience to help break the strikes will have a minimal impact because of the small number who are likely to be involved. Richard Rosser, leader of the rail industry's white collar union, yesterday urged his members not to cross picket lines.

Railtrack has concentrated resources on the main routes into the big cities and in high-tech signal boxes controlling long sections of track.

In the absence of a significant return to work management conceded it would have difficulty in operating branch lines controlled by labour-intensive mechanical signal boxes.

Jimmy Knapp, leader of the Rail, Maritime and Transport union, said there was no sign of a crack in the industrial action. 'Members have a very firm resolve to get a just settlement,' he said.

Yesterday's industrial action began amid a row over an offer of free overseas trips to managers who are helping to operate services during strike days.

The Railtrack southern zone is offering to take inspectors, managers and supervisors on special trips next month to Paris and Brussels on the new Channel tunnel Eurostar service, which is not yet open to the public. Mr Knapp said that the offer was not available to signal workers, whether they worked on strike days or not, and so was even discriminating against employees who supported the management.

Brian Mawhinney, Secretary of State for Transport, called on signal workers to put pressure on their union to resume negotiations.

He told Tynemouth Conservative Association that a restructuring package was available for negotiation. 'I hope that signalmen will ask their union for how much longer the railway industry must suffer while its passengers and freight users desert, and what will be the long-term effect of this on their jobs?

'Signalmen need to ask the RMT to explain precisely why they refuse to negotiate with Railtrack,' Dr Mawhinney said.

The union said the minister's statements would carry more credibility if he had spoken to both sides in the dispute instead of sticking rigidly to Railtrack's line.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in