Rail office will balance interests
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.JOHN SWIFT, the Rail Regulator, in his first public interview yesterday emphasised his independence from the Government, writes Christian Wolmar.
Mr Swift said he would not hesitate to make difficult decisions to protect the interests of passengers, but he did accept he was constrained by the financial situation of the railways and of the private companies that will operate them after privatisation.
The office of Rail Regulator is a key part of the restructuring of the railways for privatisation, which begins in earnest in April next year.
It has the job of ensuring that the new structure operates effectively and will be known as ORR, rather than Ofrail, which would clearly have been a hostage to fortune. Mr Swift will issue licences to new operators, 'promote the use of the network' and will also approve access agreements.
Mr Swift, a QC specialising in competition law, accepted his job did not just involve the interests of passengers, but included a responsibility to the companies who obtain franchises to operate services and to the franchising director who allocates them. That means, he said, 'like other regulators, I will have to balance conflicting interests'.
He accepted that in the new system the buck will rest with him.
'We're going to be decision makers and will need to make good ones,' he said.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments