Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

PSNI response to data breach will not be fudged, Boutcher vows

PSNI Chief Constable Jon Boutcher was giving evidence to a Westminster committee.

By Grinne N. Aodha
Wednesday 13 December 2023 07:27 EST
PSNI Chief Constable Jon Boutcher gave evidence to a Westminster committee about a major data breach in the force (Liam McBurney/PA)
PSNI Chief Constable Jon Boutcher gave evidence to a Westminster committee about a major data breach in the force (Liam McBurney/PA) (PA Wire)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) response to a major data breach which saw the details of all officers and staff published online will not be fudged, Chief Constable Jon Boutcher has said.

During an appearance before the Northern Ireland Affairs Committee, Mr Boutcher also said that the ultimate financial costs of the leak to the force are “not known”.

In August the details of almost 9,500 PSNI officers and staff were mistakenly published in response to a Freedom of Information (FoI) request.

The list included the surname and first initial of every employee, their rank or grade, where they are based and the unit in which they work.

Police later said the information is in the hands of dissident republicans.

The PSNI has previously indicated that the data breach could potentially cost the force £240 million in security and legal costs

The controversy contributed to the resignation of then-chief constable Simon Byrne and led the PSNI and Policing Board to commission a review.

On Monday, the review, headed by Pete O’Doherty, temporary commissioner at the City of London Police, made 37 recommendations.

It said the breach was the consequence of the service not seizing opportunities to secure and protect its internal information and pointed to a “siloed approach” to information management functions.

Mr Boutcher told MPs that “every police force in the country needs to read this report and understand the recommendations and apply our learning to their own organisation”.

What I can promise you is this isn’t going to be fudged, we’re not going to shy away from this

Jon Boutcher

He said: “There is a culture in policing, that is extremely nervous about cloud-based solutions technology-wise and we need to explore with partners how we can address some of those failings that have been identified in the report.

“What I can promise you is this isn’t going to be fudged, we’re not going to shy away from this. We will progress it but we have to do it within the context of the current financial envelope.”

Mr Boutcher said he cannot currently give an estimate of the cost of implementing the 37 recommendations made in the independent review.

“I can’t give you a clear figure at the moment but it’s something that we are seeking to determine,” he said.

Temporary deputy Chief Constable Chris Todd said a bid for preliminary costs of “around 30 million” had been submitted, but there would be “additional costs”.

“Our bid that was negotiated with the Treasury went through for around 30 million and that’s still being worked through parts of it. We did have some promising news just last week but it’s still a work in progress.

“But it’s fair to say the report has highlighted some additional requirements which weren’t in that original estimate … so there will be some additional costs.”

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in