Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Prison chiefs adopt new code on psychiatric care

Heather Mills,Home Affairs Correspondent
Monday 26 October 1992 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

PRISON GOVERNORS are to adopt a code of minimum psychiatric standards in an effort to improve care of the large numbers of mentally ill people detained in the country's 128 jails.

The Home Office is also devising a series of pilot schemes to buy in greater supervision and services from the National Health Service.

While one of the main aims of ministers is to move as many disordered offenders as possible into hospitals, the reality is that lack of beds and other provision in the community means that most remain in jail.

Studies have shown that about a quarter of the 47,000-plus prison population has psychiatric problems.

The moves come in response to widespread criticism of the Prison Medical Service and in particular its psychiatric services following the doubling of prison suicides in the 1980s. The Home Office's own scrutiny report two years ago was also damning of the medical service's isolation from mainstream medicine.

Although it fell short of reformers' demands that the NHS take over responsibility for prison hospitals completely, the scrutiny report urged much closer alignment with the health service and called for more civilian doctors and nurses to be given contracts to work in jails instead of career prison service staff.

The Home Office has devised 20 pilot schemes around the country which include buying in clinical as well as psychiatric care from the NHS. On the Isle of Wight, for example, officials are negotiating a contract with health authorities to provide all health care in the island's three prisons, Albany, Parkhurst and Camp Hill.

Two lined up for increased NHS psychiatric care are Brixton jail in south London and Feltham young offenders' centre in west London - both deal with large numbers of the mentally ill and, in the past, both have had spates of suicides.

The Home Office cites the new jail, Belmarsh in south-east London, which buys in two full-time NHS psychiatrists. Through their contacts, they are able to move the seriously ill into hospitals within about three days of diagnosis compared with, for example, Brixton prison which currently takes on average two weeks.

Proposed minimum standards which also govern staff training and improved qualifications include allocating a named doctor and health care worker to each patient; ensuring patients have as much time out of their cells as possible - ideally 12 hours to include 6 of clinically advised activity; and that there is through care after the prisoner is released or transferred.

But last night, while the changes were welcomed, there was criticism that there was no date for implementation and that reform did not go far enough to address the 'services' punitive and out-dated medical culture'.

Ian Bynoe, legal director of Mind, the mental health charity, said: 'Better health care will need more than just an NHS label. Staff must be accountable to prisoner patients in new and effective ways, ensuring that they get NHS specialist treatment when they need this.'

Mr Bynoe and Stephen Shaw, of the Prison Reform Trust, feared the Treasury axe might fall on both NHS resources and on Home Office contract funding, scuppering the proposals, leaving many services untouched and prisoners without the treatment they needed.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in