Porn station fails to win block on decoder ban: Red Hot TV defiant despite court defeat
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE MAN behind Red Hot Television yesterday promised to carry on his fight after the satellite channel lost an important action in the Court of Appeal. 'It will be business as usual,' Gorm Oldorf, managing director of Continental Television in Copenhagen, said. Mr Oldorf said that 'somebody in Britain is making laws blindfolded'.
Three judges upheld a High Court decision that the Government could stop the company selling decoders in Britain from next Saturday. Other government measures block advertising or promotion of the channel. The High Court ruled that the case had to be decided in Europe but would not allow Continental an injunction to stop the government action.
The High Court said that it considered as a matter of public policy that the pornography channel risked causing serious harm to children's morals.
While the British action does not kill the station off, it will damage it. Those who have purchased decoders will be able to carry on using them. The company has said that it will switch to a new system which is compatible with existing decoders. 'And if necessary, we will move outside the EC,' Mr Oldorf said. 'It will change nothing.'
The company argued that it would win in the European Court of Justice and that the British ruling would cost it money, and so it sought an injunction, refused by both the High Court and the Court of Appeal.
David Pannick QC, for Continental, said there was a 'strong possibility' the company would win. But the ruling by the European Court of Justice could take at least two years, according to legal experts in Brussels.
Recently a senior commission official said that despite an EC European Broadcasting directive, national governments had a wide area of manoeuvre on what they could permit.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments