Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Zac Goldsmith remark about ‘seedy list of party apparatchiks’ comes back to haunt him after Tory peerage

Former Conservative MP appears to have changed his mind about House of Lords - after being appointed to House of Lords

Colin Drury
Friday 20 December 2019 12:11 EST
Comments
Zac Goldsmith, who once said peers were "seedy ... party apparatchiks appointed by power hungry party leaders and insulated from any democratic pressure", has been made a life peer
Zac Goldsmith, who once said peers were "seedy ... party apparatchiks appointed by power hungry party leaders and insulated from any democratic pressure", has been made a life peer (PA)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

It was a principled tweet referring to the peerage system which millions of people would almost certainly have agreed with.

“Seedy lists of party apparatchiks appointed by power hungry party leaders & insulated from any democratic pressure for 15 yrs?” wrote Zac Goldsmith in 2012. “No thanks.”

The missive resurfaced on Thursday hours after it turned out that the 44-year-old’s answer to being offered the chance to become such a seedy party apparatchik was in fact: yes please.

The former Tory MP – who lost his Richmond Park seat at the general election – has been appointed to the House of Lords so he can keep his job as environment minister in Boris Johnson’s government.

It means that, despite losing three elections in just four years, this son of a billionaire has managed to be promoted to, and then retain, one of the most important offices of state.

“Evidence you can be born to a billionaire, go to Eton…become an MP on the back of no discernible talent, fail to get elected Mayor, lose your seat twice and yet still rise above it all to be made a Peer by an old family friend,” wrote one Twitter user, capturing something of a prevailing mood on the social media site. “Such a heartwarming story.”

Downing Street refused to respond to allegations of hypocrisy on Mr Goldsmith’s part. When asked how Mr Johnson had convinced Mr Goldsmith to take the peerage given his previous criticism, a spokesman said: “I don’t have details of any conversations.”

The same spokesman also dismissed allegations of cronyism, saying the the failed politician – who lost his seat to Liberal Democrat Sarah Olney – was “doing an excellent and committed job in cabinet, dealing with really important issues, and he will now be able to get on with that work and carry on delivering”.

Old Etonian Mr Goldsmith is a friend of both the prime minister and his partner Carrie Symonds, who worked on his failed bid to succeed Mr Johnson as London mayor in 2016.

His new appointment came after Nicky Morgan controversially kept her cabinet post as culture secretary, despite standing down as an MP at last week’s election, when she was made a life peer.

Mr Goldsmith's post about "seedy lists" came at a time when Nick Clegg was talking up reforms to the House of Lords, and The Independent understands the tweet was a reference to these since-rejected proposals.

Mr Goldsmith declined to comment when asked if it was hypocritical to accept the peerage given his previous criticism.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in