Work scheme 'wastes taxpayer money'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Taxpayers' money may be put at risk by the Government's Work Programme because it has been launched in the space of a year without being trialled, a committee of MPs said yesterday.
The Public Accounts Committee said the project – in which private companies are paid to get the unemployed back to work – had not been piloted and that an IT system designed to detect fraud was not ready at its launch. It also warned that people who are most difficult to help could be "parked" by companies, who will be paid by performance, without proper monitoring by the Government.
Margaret Hodge, who chairs the committee, said: "Fees will be paid by the [Department for Work and Pensions] to contractors based on outcomes and regardless of the service individuals receive. Such an arrangement might tempt contractors to pass over those who are hardest to help into employment."
A DWP spokesman said: "We are pleased that the report recognises the extent of the department's achievement in introducing the Work Programme so quickly ... We're convinced the scheme offers jobseekers the best chance of getting into work at far better value for money to taxpayers than previous schemes."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments