Whitehall to block favours for ministers after Blunkett
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Britain's senior civil servants agreed yesterday to bring in new rules in the wake of the David Blunkett affair to stop ministers abusing their position by giving special treatment to friends or constituents.
The plans were discussed at the weekly meeting in Whitehall of the permanent secretaries of all government departments.
In a move called "the revenge of the Sir Humphreys", the senior civil servants agreed that the need for tougher rules was shown by the inquiry into allegations that Mr Blunkett fast-tracked a residence visa application for the nanny of his former lover, Kimberly Quinn.
Their initiative is a coded warning to Tony Blair, who has dragged his feet over demands for a new Civil Service Act to prevent the politicisation of Whitehall and put the relationship between ministers and officials on a statutory basis.
Mr Blunkett's hopes of an early return to the Cabinet were dealt a double blow yesterday. John Prescott, the Deputy Prime Minister, said on BBC Radio 4: "He [Mr Blunkett] admitted that he had a conflict in the personal handling of this case. It was contrary to the rules of ministers. He has been found guilty of the offence, basically, that's what happened. Not so much an open verdict.
"He [Sir Alan] found he had intervened. But ... he has faced up to his full responsibility and resigned. That's the most a minister can do."
Friends of Mrs Quinn fired a warning shot at Mr Blunkett as he prepared for another round in his legal battle to win access to her two-year-old son, who he says he fathered. Her friends warned that she was "a voracious note-taker and diary-keeper" whose memoirs could "bang the final nail into Blunkett's political coffin". The published diaries could be worth up to £1.5m.
At yesterday's meeting of Whitehall mandarins, John Gieve, the Home Office permanent secretary, raised the need for new guidelines. Sir Andrew Turnbull, the cabinet secretary, agreed to look into the question and new rules are expected in the new year.
Mr Gieve has already brought in guidelines for Home Office staff, which say: "Particular care needs to be taken over cases in which a minister may have a personal interest or connection, for example because they concern family, friends or employees." Ministers should disclose their connection to the minister taking the decision, who should avoid "special treatment".
If ministers raise a case as a constituency MP, they should not take a decision on it but refer it to another minister. If ministers examine issues drawn to their attention by MPs, groups or individuals, their private office should record when and where the case was raised and what action was taken."
Mr Blair is expected to reject demands for a new Civil Service Act to be speeded up. Draft legislation was published last month but there is no prospect of it being introduced in Parliament before the election.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments