Welcome to the Nasty Party conference
David Cameron's efforts to improve his party's image undermined by tonight's meeting of 900 Tory activists opposed to same-sex union
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.David Cameron has been warned that his attempts to shed the Conservative Party's "nasty party" image are being undermined by organisers of a mass rally against gay marriage.
About 900 people, the majority of them active members of the Conservative Party, will crowd into Birmingham Town Hall at lunchtime today to hear the former Archbishop of Canterbury, George Carey, the former Home Office minister Ann Widdecombe and others give speeches on why there should be no change in the legal definition of marriage to recognise same-sex couples.
The meeting will be ringed by a heavy police presence to prevent anyone getting in apart from party representatives and others with valid passes to the Tory conference. Several organisations, including the public sector union, the PCS, are holding what they call a "Picket the Bigots" protest outside the town hall. They accuse the rally's organisers of wanting to turn back the clock on the rights won by gays and lesbians.
"This is a very unfortunate way to open the Conservative Party conference," Peter Tatchell, the veteran gay rights campaigner said yesterday. "It sends a signal that the Tories are still the nasty party, many of whose members continue to support homophobic discrimination despite the attempts of David Cameron to modernise the party. The average person will view this rally as an insight into unreconstructed conservatism."
But the rally organisers were boosted by a survey of constituency party chairmen published yesterday, which found seven out of 10 wanted Mr Cameron to abandon his promise to change the law during this parliament; and more than half said the party had lost members because of the gay marriage issue.
Lord Carey is expected to tell today's rally: "We can be sure any move away from our traditional understanding of marriage is to put our society on a slippery slope where the unintended consequences could be shocking."
The group have also won the backing of backbench MP David Davis. He told a fringe meeting in Birmingham yesterday: "Gay marriage is an issue for the church, not the state."
Alistair Thompson, an organiser of the rally and former Tory parliamentary candidate, said: "It's complete nonsense to try to say this is about the 'nasty party'. There are a lot of questions the government has failed to answer about the seriousness of redefining marriage.
"I think when they have looked into the implications and the consequences of this, they will start to sympathise with the vast majority of people in the party. The rally resonates with what members of the party, constituency party chairman, and ordinary members of the public have said."
Coming on the first full day of the Tory conference, the rally is an embarrassment for Mr Cameron, whose senior Cabinet allies rallied to his support yesterday. The Chancellor, George Osborne, told Sky News: "I support gay marriage because I believe Conservatives support the institutions of commitment."
The Foreign Secretary, William Hague, said it was a "conscience" issue on which MPs would rightly be given a free vote.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments