Watchdog takes swipe at party leaders over leaks
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Standards watchdog Sir Christopher Kelly took a swipe at party leaders today over "frustrating" leaks of his MPs' expenses reform proposals.
He complained that partial details of the Committee on Standards in Public Life's recommendations appeared in the media "within hours" of confidential briefings last week.
He said the information had not come from his side and insisted the reaction to the leaks had not forced any change to the reforms.
Opening a press conference to launch the report, he said that Gordon Brown, David Cameron and Nick Clegg had all agreed, at the height of the scandal, to accept his report in full.
"After the report had been finalised, I accordingly briefed them, in confidence, about what it contained," he said.
"I did so in the expectation that they would be pressed, as soon as the report was published, to say whether it had their full support, and I wanted them to be in a position to say 'yes'.
"Partial accounts of what I said began to appear in the media within hours of those meetings.
"You can draw your own conclusions about how that happened. I do know that the media briefings did not come from the committee."
He went on: "The subsequent commentary, some of it based on an incomplete understanding of what was in the report, must have been extremely irritating to those affected by it who were not yet able to see it in full.
"I understand that frustration. Indeed, I share it. It has also been very frustrating for the committee.
"It goes without saying that it has not caused us to alter our recommendations in any way at all."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments