Watchdog calls for drastic changes in wake of police commissioner poll turnout fiasco
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Just one person in five believed they received enough information to cast an informed vote in last year’s ill-fated contests for the first Police and Crime Commissioners, the elections watchdog said today.
In a scathing verdict on the Home Office’s mishandling of the polls, the Electoral Commission said the department believed that simply holding the contests would be enough to inspire voters to take part.
In the end, turnout in the 41 elections in November slumped to a derisory 15 per cent, the lowest level of any nationwide election held in peace time.
The commission called for wide-ranging changes to avoid a repeat of the fiasco at the next set of PCC elections in 2016.
It discovered that only 22 per cent of electors said they had enough details about their candidates to be able to choose properly between them. More than half (55 per cent) found it difficult to find information about candidates, while 76 per cent said they either knew nothing or “not very much” about the elections.
The Home Office decided against paying for a mailshot to all households in England and Wales, relying on electors finding out online about the candidates in their areas. It also ran a £3m advertising campaign to raise awareness of the elections, but election rules meant it had to end several weeks before voting.
Jenny Watson, the Chair of the Electoral Commission, said: “The overriding lesson is that the Government cannot assume holding an election is enough on its own to inspire participation.
“People have to know what they are voting for, and understand what different candidates might offer, in order to participate. And to make sure voters can play their part easily, those responsible for running the polls must have clarity far enough in advance of election day to allow for proper planning.”
She also said the rules for the PCC elections were “confirmed unacceptably late, causing confusion for candidates and electoral administrators”.
Ms Watson added: “The Home Office does not have experience in preparing for elections and they need to be better supported in future by the parts of Government that do.”
PCCs, which replaced existing police authorities, were handed the power to set force budgets and even hire and fire chief constables. The victors are paid salaries between £65,000 and £100,000 depending on the size of the forces they are overseeing.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments