Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Upskirting culprits will be added to sex offenders register and receive two years in prison, Theresa May says

Ministers intervened to curb a major outcry after a Conservative MP blocked a backbench bill to ban the practice of taking surreptitious pictures under women's skirts

Lizzy Buchan
Political Correspondent
Wednesday 20 June 2018 14:38 EDT
Comments
Theresa May: 'Upskirting is a hideous invasion of privacy'

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

People who take “upskirt” pictures could face two years in prison and be added to the sex offenders register under a new bill being laid before parliament.

Theresa May confirmed that a government bill to tackle upskirting will be introduced in the Commons on Thursday, allowing MPs to debate the issue before the summer recess.

Ministers intervened to curb a major outcry after Conservative MP Christopher Chope blocked a backbench bill to ban the practice of taking surreptitious pictures up women’s skirts and dresses – because of his long-standing objection to the private member’s bill system.

Both his parliamentary and constituency offices were later festooned with underwear in protest.

Speaking during prime minister’s questions, Ms May said: “Upskirting is a hideous invasion of privacy. It leaves victims feeling degraded and distressed.

“We will adopt this as a government bill. We will introduce the bill to the Commons this Thursday, with a second reading before the summer recess. But we are not stopping there.

“We will also ensure that the most serious offenders are added to the sex offenders register and victims should be in no doubt that their complaints will be taken seriously and perpetrators will be punished.”

Upskirting can be prosecuted through laws such as outraging public decency or harassment, but the new bill would make it a dedicated sexual offence.

It carries a two-year prison sentence in Scotland, where it is a specific offence, and the government has already confirmed its support for a maximum sentence of two years for repeat offenders, bringing it in line with other voyeurism charges.

The move comes after peers heard that men wearing kilts would also be protected by a new law.

Speaking in the Lords, Baroness Vere of Norbiton said the ban would protect the “bodily dignity” of both men and women, which would include “kilt upskirting”.​

Sir Christopher, who was knighted in the New Year’s Honours list, insisted he was being “scapegoated” and he was merely acting on his long-held principle to oppose backbench bills when he blocked the upskirting bill, tabled by Liberal Democrat MP Wera Hobhouse.

He said: “The suggestion that I am some kind of pervert is a complete travesty of the truth. It’s defamatory of my character and it’s very depressing some of my colleagues have been perpetuating that in the past 48 hours.”

The campaign has been led by Gina Martin, 26, who created a petition to make it a dedicated offence after someone took photos under her skirt at a music festival last year.

She said: “This law change has happened because it was important to me and I realised it was important to so many of us.

“I kept going because I didn’t want to brush it off again, and say ‘this is just part of life’. I kept going because we needed a change.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in