Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

UK government suspends military training to Belarus dictatorship after outcry

Campaigners say UK should not have been training country’s forces in the first place

Jon Stone
Policy Correspondent
Saturday 05 September 2020 08:31 EDT
Comments
A heavily policed protest in Belarus last month
A heavily policed protest in Belarus last month (Reuters)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The British government has suspended the provision of military training to Belarus’s army, amid accusations that the UK has been “strengthening and legitimising” the country’s dictatorship.

The Independent reported last month that UK military instructors had been teaching Belarusian troops as recently as March this year, despite the country being widely regarded as a dictatorship.

Following the revelations, ministers quietly announced this week that any training had been temporarily stopped, “in light of recent events” – probably a reference to the popular uprising against the country’s rigged presidential election.

Campaigners said the UK should never have been training the Belarusian army in the first place, given its “appalling human rights record” and said there should be no return to the old policy once attention had gone elsewhere.

Junior defence minister James Heappey said in a written statement that the UK and Belarus had “shared a cooperative defence relationship which aims to promote mutual learning and understanding through events such as winter survival training, language training and peacekeeping training” – failing to mention other courses overseen by the UK such as “advanced command”.

The minister added: “However, in light of recent events we have decided to suspend our defence engagement programme with Belarus and will keep this under close review.”

In the aftermath of Belarus’s contested 9 August elections, thousands of protesters have been detained by authorities, hundreds thought to have been tortured, and at least four have died.

Tens of thousands of people took to the streets across the country again this week, while authorities withdrew accreditation from 17 reporters, mostly for foreign media outlets.

The UK has said it does not accept the result of the elections, with the foreign secretary Dominic Raab describing it as “fraudulent” and calling for an investigation by the independent Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe.

Alexander Lukashenko, president of Belarus (Tass/Getty)
Alexander Lukashenko, president of Belarus (Tass/Getty) (Tass)

He said the world had “watched with horror at the violence used by the Belarusian authorities to suppress the peaceful protests”.

But the latest repression came as little surprise in the country, which Freedom House (a think tank) has consistently rated as “not free” on account of it being “an authoritarian state in which elections are openly orchestrated and civil liberties are tightly restricted”.

Andrew Smith, of the Campaign Against Arms Trade, said: “This is a welcome announcement, but the UK should never have been training with the Belarus army in the first place. The regime has an appalling human rights record which is upheld by a brutal and authoritarian army. The UK should never have been doing anything to strengthen or support it.

“It is vitally important that this is a lasting change. There cannot simply be a return to business as usual once the headlines have gone away. There must be an end to the duplicitous and hypocritical approach to foreign policy that has allowed this to happen.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in