UK breached prisoners’ rights over voting, EU judges say
Court rejects applications for compensation
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Britain breached the human rights of more than 1,000 prisoners by preventing them from voting in elections, European judges have ruled.
Their judgement is a fresh blow for the policy which has been supported both by Labour and Conservative governments. David Cameron has said the thought of giving the vote to prison inmates makes him feel “physically ill”.
The European Court of Human Rights ruled that the ban violated the right to a free election under the European Convention on Human Rights.
It grouped together all 1,015 cases brought by offenders against Britain on the issue.
However, the court rejected an application by prisoners for compensation and their legal costs.
Former inmate John Hirst said: “It is a real shame compensation has not been awarded. While I can get some satisfaction from the ruling, the Government keeps ignoring what the ECHR is saying.
“It has been 10 years since my case and still nothing has changed. The only way I can see to force the issue is to impose some kind of financial penalty.”
Sean Humber, the lawyer representing 554 prisoners pressing for the right to vote, welcomed the ruling, but said compensation should have been awarded, particularly in light of the lack of action from successive governments.
A Ministry of Justice spokesman said: “The government has always been clear it believes prisoner voting is an issue that should ultimately be decided in the UK. However, we welcome the court’s decision to refuse convicted prisoners costs or damages.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments