Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Trust undermined by WMD failure - Clarke

Colin Brown,Deputy Political Editor
Monday 03 July 2006 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The former home secretary Charles Clarke admitted yesterday that the failure to find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq has undermined public confidence in Britain's intelligence services.

Public doubts about the reliability of the intelligence services had been reinforced by the raid by hundreds of police at Forest Gate and the shooting of a Muslim after a tip-off, said Mr Clarke, who was one of the most loyal supporters of Mr Blair on the war.

His remarks put renewed pressure on Tony Blair over his "war on terror" as he prepares to mark the first anniversary of the July 7 bombings on Friday.

Mr Clarke, who was sacked in the last cabinet reshuffle, warned the lack of public trust in the intelligence service over the WMD needed to be repaired urgently.

"The experience with suspected weapons of mass destruction in Iraq undermined confidence in the capacity of our intelligence services to make accurate assessments of the risks that we face," he said.

"The recent events at Forest Gate reinforced that and there remain allegations that more information was held on those who became the July 7 bombers than has been revealed."

Defending the intelligence services, Mr Clarke said: "On the basis of my own knowledge and understanding of intelligence issues, I am convinced there is absolutely no foundation to the allegation that our intelligence services or police had information about the July 7 bombers and did not follow it up professionally."

However, there are also suspicions of political interference in the operation of the intelligence services. Whitehall sources claim there is a dispute between MI5 and the police over whether it was wise to carry out the Forest Gate raid without more evidence. There have been claims that the decision went all the way up to the chairman of the recently-appointed Joint Intelligence Committee, Sir Richard Mottram.

The Prime Minister's intelligence and security committee is secretly investigating these claims. Suspicions still remain that the threat from Saddam's weapons of mass destruction was exaggerated on the orders of Downing Street, in spite of the Hutton report, which cleared the Government of the charge.

Conservative sources are keen to avoid being accused of making the July 7 anniversary a party political issue, but last night leading Tories renewed their call for an independent inquiry. Patrick Mercer, the Tory spokesman on homeland security said: "With a former home secretary coming out in this way, the Government cannot continue to resist the growing pressure to lance this boil."

Mr Clarke, writing in the London Evening Standard, delivered a withering attack on the judiciary. The former minister, who lost a court battle over his attempt to hold suspects in effect under house arrest, accused senior judges of interpreting the Human Rights Act in a way that caused "deep concern to the security of our society, but without any responsibility for that security".

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in