Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Trident: Jeremy Corbyn's argument for unarmed submarines is 'dangerous nonsense', says former Royal Navy chief

Labour peer Admiral Lord West has been a leading critic of the party leader's stance on the missile system

Jonathan Owen
Wednesday 03 February 2016 13:57 EST
Comments
Admiral Lord West, Labour peer and former head of the Royal Navy
Admiral Lord West, Labour peer and former head of the Royal Navy (Wikimedia/Creative Commons)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Labour peer Admiral Lord West, former head of the Royal Navy, has condemned Jeremy Corbyn’s suggestion that the next generation of Britain’s nuclear submarines should be unarmed as ‘dangerous nonsense.’

Mr Corbyn’s opposition to nuclear weapons has divided the Labour Party, with Lord West a leading critic of the party leader’s stance on the Trident missile system.

Earlier this month Mr Corbyn argued that new submarines could be deployed without nuclear warheads.

But such a move, with the time it would take to arm the submarines if needed, could “result in a pre-emptive strike before the weapons are ready to fire,” according to Lord West.

Writing in Parliament’s The House magazine, he said: “Having a Vanguard successor with missiles but no warheads fitted is dangerous and nonsensical.”

He added: “It would be foolhardy for any British government of whatever hue to make us vulnerable to possible threats by giving up the power to retaliate.”

Lord West, who was responsible for Trident between 2002 and 2006, said: “The very invulnerability of the submarine from detection...and the assuredness of warhead delivery make it the ultimate post strike system.”

His comments come ahead of a vote on the future of the nuclear deterrent, expected in Parliament next month, in which some 130 Labour MPs are likely to vote in favour of renewing Trident.

Despite Mr Corbyn’s opposition, Labour policy remains in favour of having a nuclear deterrent.

And according to the former First Sea Lord and Chief of the Naval Staff, the case for Trident is “so self evident that I expect the Labour Party to keep its manifesto commitment.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in