Treasury opposed to extending pay norm: Warning over public sector wage restraint
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.TREASURY ministers are warning Cabinet colleagues that another year of the 1.5 per cent pay norm would bring clashes with public sector unions.
Senior Treasury sources said yesterday they were opposed to the spending departments seeking to extend the pay norm to make it easier to meet Treasury demands for cuts in their budgets. 'It would not stick,' one ministerial source said.
The Prime Minister said the issue would be resolved 'in the very near future', but with the Treasury's opposition, it is almost certain the Government will be seeking wage restraint without a formal pay norm.
Treasury ministers fear the row has made it more difficult to seek cuts in some budgets. They blame the Department of Health for leaks to stop cuts in free prescriptions for the elderly and children, though ministers refuse to rule it out until the spending battles are over in the autumn.
Lord Howe, the former Chancellor, and Lord Callaghan, the former Labour Prime Minister, urged John Major to revive the Cabinet 'think tank' that Lady Thatcher disbanded for 'thinking the unthinkable' in the 1980s after a paper proposing deep cuts in the welfare state was leaked.
Lord Howe told a sub-committee of the Treasury and Civil Service Select Committee that the Central Policy Review Staff would have a wider function than the Number 10 policy unit, looking at medium-term questions. 'I put a paper before the Cabinet on exactly the same ground as the Chief Secretary (Michael Portillo) is now presenting to the nation.'
Unhappily, Lord Howe said, the Treasury allowed the paper to be illustrated with figures. When it was leaked, it 'frightened the horses in the street and set back the whole process half a decade if not a decade'.
Lord Callaghan called for a code of practice to be established for the Civil Service. 'There hasn't been any conscious arrogance by the Government, but because of the length of time they have been there, the Civil Service at the top levels has unconsciously accepted or been repelled by the flavour that has come from the Government,' he said.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments