Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Trade Union Bill: Lib Dems to help Labour prevent bill from stifling party funding

Peers will support an amendment to the Trade Union Bill, which targets valuable political levies

Mark Leftly
Deputy Political Editor
Saturday 16 January 2016 18:04 EST
Comments
Labour has estimated that the Trade Union Bill could cost them as much as £35m in an electoral cycle
Labour has estimated that the Trade Union Bill could cost them as much as £35m in an electoral cycle (Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Liberal Democrat peers are to help Labour water down the Trade Union Bill, which will dramatically reduce the party’s funding, in an amendment on Wednesday.

The support should give Labour enough votes to pass an amendment that would mean parts of the Bill that relate to political funding will be separated out and examined by a cross-party committee of peers. This was originally drafted by Lord Tyler, the Liberal Democrat constitutional reform spokesman, who wants the committee to examine broader political funding.

Baroness (Angela) Smith, Labour’s House of Lords leader, is now sponsoring the amendment. She believes there is a case for a committee to scrutinise political funding specifically, because the Government admitted it had not evaluated how the bill will affect Labour’s finances.

Labour believes it is a partisan attempt to secure the Conservatives’ financial dominance and has estimated it could lose as much as £35m in an electoral cycle. The Bill requires members of Labour-affiliated unions, for example, to opt in to paying a levy to the party, when they currently can opt out – making a costly psychological difference.

Baroness Smith, the Labour leader in the House of Lords, is sponsoring the amendment
Baroness Smith, the Labour leader in the House of Lords, is sponsoring the amendment (PA)

Lord Tyler said the amendment is a “one-off opportunity to look at the whole issue of party funding and see if we can’t sort it [out]”. The Select Committee would not have a government majority, which Lord Tyler hopes will mean a range of options for broader party funding, such as making political donations subject to tax relief, could be considered.

Recommendations made by the committee, which Labour hopes would include overturning the proposals on trade union funding, could then be incorporated in the Bill.

Lady Smith said: “The Government is hell-bent on this Bill, but let’s shine a bit of a light on this and, fairly, look at party-funding across the board.”

Iain McNicol, the Labour Party’s general secretary, told The Independent on Sunday: “Something as viciously partisan as this Bill will not be forgotten. With the Tories using the power of the state to unilaterally drive detrimental changes to Labour’s funding, they are creating the precedent for the next Labour government to do the same.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in