Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Tory MPs seek help for losing Lloyd's investors

Anthony Bevins
Friday 23 October 1992 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

CONSERVATIVE MPs are planning to revive pressure on the Government and Lloyd's of London to help thousands of insurance market investors facing bankruptcy after high losses.

Attention is focused on thousands of letters that were sent out earlier this month to investors, or 'names', giving them 28 days to settle their losses.

So far, Lloyd's has taken High Court legal action against only 172 names - with the ultimate threat of bankruptcy. But some Conservative MPs are concerned that thousands more are moving inexorably into the same process.

Defences against High Court action are being organised by a number of groups, including the Writs Response Group whose co-chairman, Richard Platts, said yesterday that their first aim was to avert the risk of summary judgement against defendants, opening the way for the bailiffs.

'The idea of pursuing about 2,000 people through the courts would be a daunting prospect for Lloyd's,' Mr Platts said. 'They don't know who's got money, and who's skint.'

Some Conservative MPs are hoping to exploit the vulnerability exposed by the Government over pit closures to push the case for Lloyd's action.

But there has been distinct public and media antipathy towards the plight of Lloyd's names, regarded by most as well-heeled gamblers who took a risk and lost.

The loss-makers counter that July's Walker report found that standards of care and diligence by a number of unnamed market insiders had fallen 'materially below best practice', and that there had been an 'unattractive appearance' of brokers and managing agents giving themselves a better deal than outsiders.

A Channel 4 programme in the Greed and Glory series, to be broadcast tomorrow, alleges that David Coleridge, the outgoing Lloyd's chairman, was a member of two 'baby', or restricted membership syndicates in the 1980s.

A previous programme in the series said Mr Coleridge had been a member of one 'baby' - syndicate 973. Mr Coleridge told the programme: 'I can quite see that if you get six or seven people, or even 50 people, on a syndicate which is not open to obviously large numbers, it is inevitable that it will be considered there must be something special about it.'

Tomorrow's programme, Major Offenders, alleges that Mr Coleridge was a member of another 'baby' - marine syndicate 207 - one of the most profitable in the market up to 1984 when 'babies' were banned by Lloyd's.

Mr Coleridge was chairman of Sturge Holdings plc, and syndicate 207 was run by RW Sturge & Co. The syndicate included Susan Coleridge; Mr Coleridge's business partner, Ralph Rokeby Johnson; Caecilia Rokeby Johnson; and Nicholas Edwards, a director of AL Sturge (Holdings) Ltd before he became Secretary of State for Wales in 1979.

In tomorrow's programme, Michael Baxter, a member of 207 and an underwriter with Mr Coleridge's firm between 1973 and 1983, said the syndicate was 'only put on what I would call, well, quality business', and that its members, 'I believe, were mostly within the company or associated, closely associated with the company in some way . . . the idea was that this would perhaps be the gilt on the gingerbread of the rest of the underwriting'.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in