Tories urged to privatise benefits
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.UNEMPLOYMENT benefit, maternity benefit and state-funded residential care for the elderly were yesterday put on the agenda for the Government's fourth wave of privatisation, by the right-wing Adam Smith Institute.
Madsen Pirie, who heads the institute, also urged the Government to allow people to opt out of the basic state pension and into private insurance schemes.
An adviser to the Prime Minister on the Citizen's Charter, Mr Pirie believes the Thatcherite agenda in the report will meet John Major's search for more competition for public services.
It comes as Michael Portillo, a leading right-winger in the Cabinet and Chief Secretary to the Treasury, embarks on a radical review of public expenditure. It called on the Government to provide inducements, such as tax incentives or bonds, for more people to opt out of state benefits, including the basic pension, by taking out private insurance.
The cost of funding statutory sick pay and the industrial injuries scheme could be shifted to employers. That would allow national insurance contributions to be reduced. Private insurers would be better at policing the schemes and making sure benefits were paid only to those who genuinely qualified, Mr Pirie said. Those who opted out of state benefits should be excused part of the contribution they currently made toward state schemes. The Government would require evidence that the private schemes offered adequate benefits and were protected against the failure of any individual company.
Updating the Tory commitment to contracting out public services, he said local authorities should award contracts for services such as refuse collection to two private companies who could compete for their share of custom from the council tax payers.
It would be simple to overcome the objection that it would be uneconomic for two firms to operate the same service, he added. 'The firms would issue bins and bags of different colours. One firm would go through picking up the red bags; the other would collect the blue ones. The local authority might specify one collection day to avoid the problem of having unsightly garbage piled up on too many days. Each firm would pick up from its own customers.'
The Radical Agenda, Privatization of Choice; Madsen Pirie; Adam Smith Institute, 23 Great Smith Street, London SW1P 3BL.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments