Tories to set out their plan for press regulation
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Plans to create an independent press regulator backed by royal charter will be set out on Tuesday by the Conservatives.
Labour and the Liberal Democrats have backed the statutory underpinning of media laws proposed by Lord Justice Leveson following his inquiry into media ethics. But David Cameron has opposed the move, which he has claimed would "cross the Rubicon".
Oliver Letwin, the Cabinet Office minister, will detail the Tories' alternative proposals tomorrow.
All-party talks on the issue will take place on Thursday. The Liberal Democrats are understood to be sympathetic to the Letwin plan, although Labour remains hostile.
The subject has been given fresh impetus by a Lords vote last week calling for the creation of an arbitration service for people who felt wronged by a newspaper.
The Government now has to decide whether to overturn the vote when it comes before MPs or to accelerate efforts to reach all-party agreement. An opinion poll published yesterday showed that more than half of voters think a new system of press regulation should be backed by law.
Some 53 per cent felt statute was necessary if the new regime was to be effective and independent, while 23 per cent thought legal backing would put at risk the freedom of the press, the YouGov survey for the Media Standards Trust found.
Asked whether Lord Justice Leveson's proposals for reform – which included legislation – should be implemented, almost three-quarters (74 per cent) said they should, while 9 per cent said they should not.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments