Tories to consider making pensioners opt in on winter fuel allowance
Policy Exchange think tank says the move could save £400m
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Pensioners would have to actively opt in to receive their winter fuel allowance under a plan to be considered by the Conservatives.
Policy Exchange, a think tank with close links to David Cameron and George Osborne, says the move could save £400m a year because many better-off pensioners would not claim the payments, which are worth between £200 and £300 a year.
The idea is included in a report published today to help the Tories achieve their target of £12bn in welfare cuts after the May general election. Although Mr Cameron has defended universal benefits for pensioners including winter fuel payments, Tory ministers are said to be keen to see a public debate on the plan for them to “tick a box” to receive the payments.
Policy Exchange said its proposal would not take winter fuel allowances away from old people struggling to pay their heating bills because low-income pensioners who qualify for the pension credit top-up would still receive the payments automatically.
Steve Hughes, the report’s author, said: “Presenting pensioners with a choice to receive their winter fuel payment could lead to hundreds of millions of pounds worth of savings, and is just one way to root out perceived unfairness.”
Policy Exchange also called for the basic state pension to be included in the welfare cap introduced by the Coalition government because it accounts for more than 40 per cent of welfare spending.
Ministers are keen on the think tank’s call for benefits paid out to reflect more fully contributions paid in such as national insurance. It proposed that Jobseeker’s Allowance be replaced by “personal welfare accounts” to be used when people were out of work. It called for a relaxation of the sanctions regime under which the jobless lose benefits if they do not attend interviews or accept work or training.
Policy Exchange said child benefit should be limited to four children per household to save £1bn by 2020. Iain Duncan Smith, the Work and Pensions Secretary, has floated the idea of limiting payments to two children.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments