Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Tom Peck's Sketch: Riddle wrapped in a mystery – and that’s just Philip Hammond

As Foreign Secretary, it fell to him to give the Government’s position on news that Russia claims to be ending its military operations in Syria

Tom Peck
Tuesday 15 March 2016 17:34 EDT
Comments
Philip Hammond revealed a little-known fact about Putin’s eyesight
Philip Hammond revealed a little-known fact about Putin’s eyesight (Reuters)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A shock revelation from a man called Philip Hammond, who you might know is the Foreign Secretary. “Putin does not see shades of grey,” he breezily announced at the despatch box, prompting immediate speculation as to why he was wasting his time in Whitehall and not wandering invisible around the Kremlin, harvesting crucial Russian state secrets.

If you don’t know who Philip Hammond is, imagine John Major’s Spitting Image puppet without the glasses and without the animator’s arm up its back. As Foreign Secretary, it fell to him to give the Government’s position on news that Russia claims to be ending its military operations in Syria.

Asked whether the media reports could be believed, his answer was positively Churchillian. “We have no insight at all into Russia’s strategy, Russia’s thinking and Russia’s tactics, so we are left guessing,” he said, as Winston himself should have said instead of that riddle/mystery/enigma nonsense. (He is believed to have been halfway through the latest Dan Brown novel at the time).

Hammond's Putin put-down

It’s a complicated situation. Take eastern Ukraine, for example. As Kevin Foster pointed out, when Russian troops say they’re pulling out, they have a tendency to reappear, speaking Russian, firing Russian weapons and eating Russian rations, only with the badges gone from their lapels.

“I cannot rule that out, but what we are primarily talking about here is air forces, and that trick is a little more difficult to perform in the case of advanced strike aircraft,” Hammond replied. It’s possible it was a joke, but we can never know.

Labour’s shadow Defence Secretary also noted a statement from Russia’s Defence Minister that Russia “would continue to attack so-called terrorists”, these so-called terrorists not being the so-called Isis but rather the forces that Britain and the West are hoping will eventually replace the Assad government.

To be fair to Putin, “terrorist” is a confusing term. The two Russians who spent months preparing the polonium-210 murder of Alexander Litvinenko in such a way as to make it look like natural causes and be entirely undetectable were recently called “nuclear terrorists” by Andy Burnham. Gordon Brown once thought Icelandic banks were run by terrorists and used anti-terrorist legislation to withdraw British savings from them.

The Russian spin on the matter is that it is their bombs that will now guide Assad and the rest to the negotiating table. “Job done!” The Russian ambassador to Britain declared. “Mission accomplished. Russian strikes in Syria created conditions for political settlement.”

Hammond was more sceptical. “I have said this in the House before. President Putin could have ended all this years ago by a single phone call to President Assad, offering him some fraternal advice about his future health and wellbeing.”

It’s possible he’s told Putin as much himself. A pity he can’t see him.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in