Theresa May risks fury by claiming police officers have received huge pay increase since 2010
‘They have actually seen an increase in their pay of over £9,000 since 2010 – a real terms increase of 32 per cent’
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Some police officers have enjoyed a huge boost to their pay packets over the past few years, Theresa May has claimed, risking a further clash with rank-and-file staff.
The Prime Minister also refused to guarantee that her decision to lift the pay cap – but require forces to fund it – would add to the 20,000 job losses suffered since 2010, during stormy questions in the Commons.
The claim came despite a Conservative Police and Crime Commissioner (PCC) warning he would have to lose more officers if he was forced to foot the pay bill.
Meanwhile, Jeremy Corbyn warned that public sector workers “are worse off again, and they have been made worse off every year for the past seven years”.
The clash came after the Government announced that police will receive a one-off 2 per cent pay rise for 2017-18, marking the end of the blanket 1 per cent cap on public sector salaries.
The decision was greeted with derision by union leaders, who pointed out that – with inflation now standing at 2.9 per cent – the award was another real-terms cut.
But Ms May insisted it was wrong to claim long-running pay restraint had left police officers worse off, because that ignored “progression pay” and income tax cuts.
“They have actually seen an increase in their pay of over £9,000 since 2010 – a real terms increase of 32 per cent,” she told MPs.
However, the Prime Minister acknowledged the “calculation” applied only to “new police officers”. They are most likely to have automatically moved up the pay scale.
The Labour leader went on the attack, saying: “Does the Prime Minister understand that inflation is now 2.9 per cent?
“Anything less means that dedicated public servants are worse off again and they have been made worse off every year for the past seven years.”
Today, John Campion, the Tory Police and Crime Commissioner (PCC) for West Mercia Police, in the West Midlands, warned a higher pay bill – £50m nationwide – would trigger inevitable cuts.
“The funding has to come from somewhere, and there is a risk that by using it for pay increases, it leaves gaps elsewhere, which could potentially lead to reductions in officer and staff numbers,” he said.
In the Commons, Mr Corbyn said: “Can the Prime Minister guarantee that no more police, or prison officers, will be lost as a result of the decisions she has made this week?”
But Ms May sidestepped the question, instead insisting she had followed recommendations made by independent bodies – for both police and prison officers.
That was rejected by one Labour MP, Louise Haigh, who said the recommendation was for the Treasury, not police forces, to fund a pay rise above 1 per cent.
Afterwards, Downing Street claimed a new officer’s take-home pay had been about £18,000 in 2010, but, because of progression pay and a higher tax-free allowance, that was now £27,500.
But Labour said a constable or sergeant had lost £6,100 in real-terms since the start of the decade, because of a pay freeze followed by the 1 per cent cap.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments