Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Use of zero hours contracts is expected to be shown to have increased when the official figures are published on Thursday morning, presenting serious challenges to new Prime Minister Theresa May in achieving her vision for Britain she outlined on the steps of Number 10 Downing Street two months ago.
Research by centre left think tank the Resolution Foundation showed that more than two out of three adult contract workers spent more than a year employed on a zero hour contract.
The contracts mean that workers are only paid for the hours they work, and are not guaranteed any hours at all. It means that if restaurants, shops or factories are not busy, staff can be told not to come into work, and receive no pay.
They also receive none or close to none of the rights and security that ordinarily enjoyed by employees.
The foundation argued that legislation should be introduced to give protections for workers who have been on a zero hours contract for over a year who work regular hours.
After considerable public pressure, Sports Direct moved to offer guaranteed hours work for directly employed staff.
Conor D'Arcy, Policy Analyst at the Resolution Foundation, said: "For some, zero hours contracts are symbolic of Britain's job-creating labour market flexibility, while for others they represent the deep insecurity that belies the recent jobs recovery.
"The fact that the use of zero hours contracts has grown - and the Prime Minister has chosen to highlight the issue of job insecurity in her maiden speech - mean that they need far closer, and more measured, scrutiny.
"Banning zero hours contracts outright is a misguided approach that risks penalising those workers, such as some students and those with caring responsibilities, who genuinely prefer the flexibility afforded by them.
"But many workers who are on them want more stability, reliable hours and greater protection. Helping them get this should be a priority of this government."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments