Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Theresa May facing call for early vote on plans to cut number of MPs from 650 to 600

The House is due to vote in the autumn on new parliamentary boundaries

Ashley Cowburn
Political Correspondent
Sunday 18 February 2018 20:08 EST
Comments
The House is due to vote in the autumn on new parliamentary boundaries, based on rule changes introduced by the coalition government in 2011
The House is due to vote in the autumn on new parliamentary boundaries, based on rule changes introduced by the coalition government in 2011 (PA)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Theresa May is facing a call for an early vote in the Commons on whether to press ahead with contentious plans to slash the number of MPs from 650 to 600.

The House is due to vote in the autumn on new parliamentary boundaries – based on rule changes introduced by the coalition government in 2011 – reducing the total number of MPs in the chamber by 9 per cent.

But MPs on the Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee (PACAC) warn that if ministers wait to consult Parliament – and the legislation fails in the Commons – then it would be too late to carry out a fresh review before the next general election.

It would mean that in 2022 the election would be fought on the existing boundaries based on population data that the committee claims is more than 20 years out of date.

“If it moved quickly, it would be possible for the Government to introduce new legislation to allow for a new boundary review and for it to be implemented prior to a 2022 election. However, the window for such a decision is short,” the committee said.

“What is clear is that there are serious problems with using the existing boundaries for a further election in 2022, which appears to be the only likely alternative option given the parliamentary arithmetic.”

“They reflect neither the changes in population since 2000, nor how devolution has further affected the UK’s constitution, especially in respect to Wales.”

Conservative MP Bernard Jenkin, who chairs the committee, said: “The time to decide this in principle is now. If the Government waits until the autumn, Parliament will be faced with an invidious choice: either approve the boundaries or hold the next election on boundaries that will be more than 20 years out of date.”

But Mr Jenkin said if that if the Government puts the vote to the Commons now, it would be possible to change the law so new boundaries at 650 seats can be in place before the next elections – scheduled for 2022.

“We therefore recommend that the House of Commons should be given and early opportunity to debate the options for reform and to decide whether or not to continue the current boundary review.”

Last year Labour called for the proposals on the table to be abandoned. Cat Smith, the Shadow Cabinet Office Minister, said at the time: “It has been clear from the start than the Tories have only been interested in their own political advantage rather than what is in the best interests of the country.”

“They need to drop their unfair, undemocratic plans, as well as ensuring the review is based on the most up-to-date register and that there is appropriate flexibility to take into account community ties and geography.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in