The trend which ignores lessons of history
ANALYSIS
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Jack Straw's proposal is another step in a trend towards treating children who are in trouble the same way as adults, in contrast to nearly a century of law which has recognised the difference.
The presumption that children between 10 and 13 cannot tell right from wrong is often overturned now.
The most notable case involved the two 10-year-old boys who were convicted of murdering the Liverpool toddler James Bulger in 1993.
But the same applies to scores of less serious cases which are brought before the youth courts up and down the country.
However, switching the burden of proof from prosecution to defence would reinforce in the minds of sentencers that children ought to be exposed to the full force of the criminal law at an earlier age - and much younger than in most comparable countries in Western Europe.
It would signal an end to the view that young children should not be held as fully criminally responsible as adults, even though the civil law already provides for those out of control to be made the subject of supervision or care orders, or where their behaviour is particularly serious, secure accommodation orders.
The change would mean an end to the prosecution being required to produce something more than proof that an offence has been committed.
In serious Crown Court cases before juries, this typically takes the form of testimony from child behavioural specialists and/or a child's teachers.
In the more run-of-the-mill cases before magistrates, it will usually be evidence of the way that the child responded to police questioning.
If it was implemented, Mr Straw's proposal would put Britain out of line with the practice of other European Union countries.
BRITAIN OUT OF STEP
t Germany treats 14- to 18-year-olds as juveniles and 18- to 21-year-olds as adults
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments