Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

The civil service isn't ready for enormity of Brexit, says former Cabinet Secretary

Lord O’Donnell also warns that EU withdrawal will 'crowd out' the ability of the civil service to perform other key tasks - after years of severe cuts

Rob Merrick
Deputy Political Editor
Thursday 17 November 2016 11:05 EST
Comments
Lord O'Donnell, the former head of the civil service
Lord O'Donnell, the former head of the civil service (Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The civil service is not ready for the enormous task of driving through Brexit, former Cabinet Secretary Gus O’Donnell has warned.

The former head of the civil service added his voice to the growing number of former Whitehall leaders and organisations highlighting the daunting problems ahead.

Lord O’Donnell also echoed criticisms that Brexit will “crowd out” the ability of the civil service to perform other key task, after years of severe cuts – without a big recruitment drive.

Asked, by The House magazine, if the civil service is prepared, Sir Gus replied: “There’s a very simple, short answer to that - which is no.

“Brexit imposes a lot of extra requirements on the civil service. They’re not perfectly ready.”

Lord O’Donnell said the civil service was “gearing themselves up for it”, but added: “It will mean bringing in new people, developing the skills in all sorts of areas and expanding them into other areas.

“I’m confident that they will get there. But no-one should be under illusions – this is an enormous job.”

The Crossbench peer argued every Government department – not simply the three directly dealing with Brexit – would need to be beefed up for the task ahead.

And he added: “What I worry about is it will crowd out other things, the whole modernization.

“I hope that those things won’t stop by everyone having to spend their time doing negotiations on our relationship with the EU, the world outside the EU, immigration policies, ECJ stuff, all of that, all huge. It will last for years and years.

“Now there are options there. One is you bring in more people, the other is you stop doing some of things that you’re doing at the minute.

“And I think government will have to make up its mind which of those it will have to do.”

The stark warning comes hard on the heels of the chief executive of the civil service arguing Whitehall is trying to do 30 per cent too much.

John Manzoni said ministers would need to scale back their ambitions or risk future policy failures.

And Sir Simon Fraser, a former permanent secretary at the Foreign Office, warned an influx of new civil servants was needed to handle the Brexit negotiations and their fallout.

“The government is still in information-gathering mode and is not yet at the point of integrating that into a central plan,” he told the Brexit select committee.

Also, this week, the Institute for Government (IfG) described Brexit as an “existential threat” to cash-starved Government departments, with the process appearing “chaotic and dysfunctional”.

And No.10 was forced to launch an attack on accountants Deloitte, after its leaked memo claimed Cabinet splits meant a proper plan for Brexit was as much as six months away.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in