Teachers' fury as PM criticises comprehensives
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Teaching unions reacted angrily yesterday after the Prime Minister declared Britain had entered a "post-comprehensive era".
In comments which went further than any previous government pronouncements on the future of the state school system, Tony Blair put the emphasis on providing "different and diverse" types of education. "The old education system, simply based around the comprehensive ideal, thinking that was enough in order to give us top quality education, isn't enough for today's world," he said.
Mr Blair drew a parallel with the National Health Service, saying that a "monolithic" service "delivered in the same old way" also was inadequate for the modern world.
Earlier, explaining his vision for state education, he said: "You retain equality of opportunity in secondary schools, but have a whole range of different and diverse suppliers."
John Dunford, general secretary of the Secondary Heads Association, said: "Comprehensives have had an enviable record of success in the last 20 years. The Government would do well to build on that and not destroy it. The policy of diversity is in danger of creating a hierarchy, making life more difficult for schools at the bottom of the pile."
A spokeswoman for the National Union of Teachers said: "It shows a lack of understanding of what comprehensives are about – they have never been 'one-size-fits-all'. They have always been individual and diverse."
She claimed that Mr Blair was hinting at higher funding for a privileged group of favoured schools, limiting the educational opportunities for many pupils.
Mr Blair's comments echo the dismissive reference last year by his director of communications and strategy, Alastair Campbell, to "bog-standard comprehensives". The resulting row forced ministers on the defensive and left them trying to rebuild relations with the teaching unions.
Meanwhile, Mr Blair came under attack yesterday for setting up sub-standard university foundation courses and using "smoke and mirrors" to hit his target of expanding the number of young people going into higher education.
The Association of University Teachers warned that many so-called "sub-degree courses" relied on colleges with poor libraries and inadequate computer facilities.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments