Sub-let fraudsters could be jailed
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Council tenants who sub-let their homes could be jailed under tough new laws being floated by the Government.
New laws will target an estimated 50,000 people who rent out their council homes - often at a profit - while living elsewhere.
Those abusing the system could have their homes taken off them and face imprisonment following the reforms, housing minister Grant Shapps said. The properties would then be freed up to be rented to those in greatest need on the housing waiting list.
Mr Shapps told the Daily Telegraph: "Social housing is really precious and it's not right that tenancy fraud and abuse locks out some of the most vulnerable families from getting a roof over their heads."
There is currently no criminal sanction against those sub-letting council homes, some of whom are thought to earn as much as £20,000 a year from the arrangement.
Tenancy fraud is believed to cost around £5 billion a year and there are 1.8 million families waiting for a council home.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments