Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Strategic defence review in danger of failing key tests, warn MPs

Kim Sengupta,Defence Editor
Tuesday 14 September 2010 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The crucial decision-making process that will shape Britain's defence strategy is taking place without adequately getting the views of the public and may make leave the military struggling to meet current obligations, according to a report produced by an influential group of MPs.

The Strategic Defence and Security Review (SDSR) is taking place too quickly and is "unlikely to be a sound foundation for the future defence of our country" said the House of Commons Defence Committee. The MPs were also critical of the confusion surrounding one of the most expensive investment packages under scrutiny – the Trident nuclear programme which is the subject of a dispute between the Treasury and the Ministry of Defence on who should be financing it.

The Committee's chairman, James Arbuthnot, said: "We are not yet convinced that the combination of a budgetary straitjacket, the short timescale, and the apparent unwillingness by the Ministry to think outside existing structures, for example with regard to the more integrated use of reservists, will deliver the required strategy."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in