Spending cuts hit poorest parts of England and Scotland much harder than affluent areas
Your support helps us to tell the story
As your White House correspondent, I ask the tough questions and seek the answers that matter.
Your support enables me to be in the room, pressing for transparency and accountability. Without your contributions, we wouldn't have the resources to challenge those in power.
Your donation makes it possible for us to keep doing this important work, keeping you informed every step of the way to the November election
Andrew Feinberg
White House Correspondent
Spending cuts have hit the poorest parts of England and Scotland much harder than more affluent areas, according to research published on Thursday.
The Joseph Rowntree Foundation (JRF), which analysed the 30 per cent real terms cut in local government spending between 2008 and 2015, said the North and Midlands are suffering more than the south, with deprived areas left about £100 per person worse off.
Researchers warned that cash-strapped councils will end up serving only the neediest fraction of the population. "As a result, the willingness of those who do not rely on council services for the majority of their needs to pay for council services relied on almost exclusively by the poor could be undermined," the report added.
John Low, the JRF’s policy and research manager, said: "Unless we can muster the national will to correct or mitigate the unacceptable divergence of resources between more and less affluent authorities, we are slowly but inexorably creating a more divided society."
The largest factor was the reduction, scrapping or merging of many specific central government grants, which targeted deprived areas. Councils in poor areas saw their spending power drop by 21 per cent, while in affluent areas it fell by 16 per cent.
Town hall spending on education fell in England because money was channelled into the Government’s flagship academies policy. Culture, the environment and planning saw larger cuts, along with transport and housing.
The divide was confirmed in a separate report by the Audit Commission spending watchdog published on Thursday, which said that almost half (49 per cent ) of councils covering the 20 per cent most deprived areas faced cuts of more than 15 per cent since 2010. Fewer than one in ten local authorities (eight per cent) of authorities in the best-off areas suffered reductions on such a scale, it said.
Brandon Lewis, the Local Government Minister, insisted that deprived areas continue to receive and spend far more money per household than other parts of the country. “Rather than the doom and gloom peddled by the JRF, the latest independent polling shows that the public are more satisfied with town hall services than ever before,” he said.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments