Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

So which affair will cost Labour the most votes?

Monday 01 May 2006 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Charles Clarke affair

The fiasco over the release of foreign prisoners is a nightmare for Labour activists. The timing of the disclosures - nine days before polling - was bad enough. But more damaging details have been dragged out of Charles Clarke since.

One canvasser in London said: "The Home Office stuff is really bad news - people have been put in danger - and it is doing deep damage."

Labour has spent years trying to build a strong image on law and order. Strategists fear much of that work could have been undone in just days.

The episode also touches on immigration - a toxic issue for the party particularly in areas where it faces a challenge from the British National Party.

Above all, it gives an impression of managerial incompetence at senior levels of the Government.

Liability rating: 5/5

The Patricia Hewitt affair

The spectacle of a Health Secretary being heckled by nurses the week before local elections could have spelt disaster for Labour. But the incident has been obliterated by the appalling publicity generated by Clarles Clarke and John Prescott. Labour foot-soldiers insist the subject is barely mentioned by voters, who tend to ask detailed questions about local hospitals rather than debate NHSreform at national level. Where hospitals are threatening to lay off staff, the doorstep exchanges have been trickier. However, the party believes the issue is a strong suit for Labour, because of public misgivings over the Tories' intentions for the NHS. A London canvasser reported that most voters did not even know Ms Hewitt's name, which he took as a good sign.

Liability rating: 2/5

The John Prescott affair

Labour activists are discovering a mixture of amusement and anger on the doorstep over the Deputy Prime Minister's amorous antics. They insist no one is going to change their vote as a result of Mr Prescott's philandering - the public already feel strongly one way or another about him. A canvasser in the east Midlands said: "Men in particular seem to think it's a bit of a laugh."

One activist even said he hoped the saga ran to polling day, to distract from the more hazardous topic of foreign criminals. However, the Ealing MP Stephen Pound said: "There is a real problem there, and on the doorstep I have to say that it is one that is causing huge problems."

Party chiefs also know the subject eats into Labour support in an insidious way, adding to a feeling of an administration in its decadent final phase.

Liability rating: 3/5

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in