Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The exclusion of the SNP from the final prime ministerial TV debate is "inherently unfair", a court was told today.
The Court of Session in Edinburgh heard the criteria used by the BBC to justify the move was "unreasonable and discriminatory".
It was further argued that the Nationalists' exclusion from Thursday's clash runs contrary to the broadcaster's own election guidance and that the balancing coverage the SNP has been given is "inadequate".
The statements were made as legal action over the scheduled debate between the UK party leaders got under way this afternoon.
The Nationalists are furious that they are not set to be part of this week's live debate between Gordon Brown, David Cameron and Nick Clegg.
Their action is seeking to ensure that the debate is broadcast in Scotland with the nation's political make-up "fairly" reflected by the national broadcaster.
The court papers state that the party is seeking an interim interdict against the BBC broadcasting the leaders' debate in Scotland if it does not feature the SNP.
The party was able to proceed with its legal action after it raised £50,000 in two days to fund the last-ditch battle. Legal papers were lodged at the court this morning.
Mungo Bovey QC, for the SNP, began the hearing by outlining the arguments on behalf of the party.
Referring to the official papers, he said: "The first chapter is that the exclusion of the petitioners' representative from the debate, which is the subject of this application, is inherently unfair."
He said the SNP's preferred representative on the programme would be leader Alex Salmond, although an election candidate could also appear.
He went on: "The criteria used to justify the exclusion of the petitioners from the debate are unreasonable and discriminatory.
"The exclusion is contrary to the BBC's own election guidance."
Mr Bovey told judge Lady Smith that the airtime, or "balancing coverage", which has been given to the party is also "inadequate".
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments