Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Sleaze watchdog to rule on Osborne claim

Andrew Woodcock,Press Association
Tuesday 19 January 2010 04:31 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The House of Commons sleaze watchdog is expected to decide today whether Shadow Chancellor George Osborne should face any reprimand or penalty over allegations that he over-claimed mortgage payments on his second home.

Mr Osborne has been the subject of a six-month investigation by parliamentary Standards Commissioner John Lyon after a complaint from a Labour activist.

Mr Lyon's report will be considered today by MPs on the Commons Standards and Privileges Committee, who have the power to decide whether the Tatton MP should be required to apologise or to repay money.

The committee will meet behind closed doors in the House of Commons, but its decision may not be made public for some days.

The Conservative MP designated his constituency property in Cheshire as his second home for expenses purposes.

It is alleged that he claimed for a mortgage of £450,000 although he had bought the property for £445,000.

Mr Osborne's spokesman said at the time that the complaint was political and there had been "absolutely no impropriety".

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in