Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Plans to replace Human Rights Act with British Bill of Rights will go ahead, Justice Secretary confirms

The Conservative manifesto pledged to bring in a new 'Bill of Rights' 

Jon Stone
Tuesday 23 August 2016 08:20 EDT
Comments
The UK Supreme Court
The UK Supreme Court (Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Conservative plans to replace the Human Rights Act with a so-called British Bill of Rights will go ahead, the Justice Secretary has said.

Liz Truss dismissed reports that that the Government was abandoning the policy, which was included in the Tories’ 2015 manifesto, to avoid a fight with the Scottish Government

“We are committed to that. That is a manifesto commitment,” she told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme on Monday morning.

“I’m looking very closely at the details but we have a manifesto commitment to deliver that.”

The Times newspaper reported earlier this month that the draft bill for the act had been junked.

“I think the priority for the justice department will be prison reform and she won’t want another fight with the Scottish government [which is opposed to the policy, and already fighting Brexit],” a source told the newspaper.

“I just don’t think the will is there to drive it through.”

Remembering when Liz Truss gave one of the weirdest speeches ever

The report was a surprise because Theresa May has previously expressed strong support for controversial constitutional change.

“This is Great Britain, the country of Magna Carta, parliamentary democracy and the fairest courts in the world,” she said in a speech in April this year.

“And we can protect human rights ourselves in a way that doesn’t jeopardise national security or bind the hands of parliament.

“A true British bill of rights, decided by parliament and amended by parliament, would protect not only the rights set out in the convention, but could include traditional British rights not protected by the ECHR such as the right to trial by jury.”

She had also however conceded that there would be “no parliamentary majority” for pulling out of the European Convention on Human Rights, of which the Human Rights Act is the current British implementation.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in